
What a year of betting actually costs
Percentages hide the pain, so we do the sums the way a real punter would feel them: the same £200 a week through every system in the strategy library, on real results, settled at Starting Price. Below is the leak per week, month and year for every habit we track, the week-by-week ride each one puts a bankroll through — and at the end, the part that matters: how to lose less.

Nobody puts a tenner on all thirty races a day, so the old “£10 on everything” sums never meant much. Here is the fair version: every system stakes exactly the same, £200 a week, spread across whatever bets it calls for, on real results. Same money in for each, so the difference you see is purely the system, not how much it bets. This is what each one takes out of a wallet.
Favourite over jumpsThe favourite, jumps only−7.8p−£16−£67−£807▾
It still loses, Pascal, and here is the honest version: backing the favourite over jumps returns -7.76% to starting price across 10,216 bets, so for every £100 staked you get about £92.24 back, with the favourite landing 37% of the time. The reason it loses is the one thing your reasoning ignores: jumpers fall and pull up. Over hurdles and fences your horse can be going best of all and still hit the deck or be eased at the second-last, and a faller is a losing bet, your full stake gone, win or lose. Add the bookmaker's margin baked into every price on top of those lost stakes and a steady leak is exactly what you get. One honest correction, though: an earlier figure on this page overstated the damage, because a settlement bug wrongly counted winnerless races as losses, which made the jumps favourite look like the worst favourite bet of the lot. Once that is put right it is nothing of the sort, the Flat favourite (-9.39%) and the handicap favourite (-8.89%) are both worse, so this is one of the less-bad favourite bets, not the steepest. It is still a loss, mind, and measured to SP with no commission, so in the real world it bleeds a touch faster.
Each-way the favouriteHalf to win, half to place−8.6p−£17−£75−£894▾
It is not a net, Pascal, it is two losing bets stapled together: across 27,676 each-way bets on the favourite the return is -8.60% to SP, so for every £100 staked you get back about £91.40. Here is why it loses. Each-way is really two stakes, a win bet and a place bet, and the place part only pays a fraction of the odds, usually a fifth or a quarter. Favourites are short-priced, so on a short favourite that place fraction often hands back barely more than your stake, sometimes less, while the bookmaker's margin, the overround, is baked into both halves. The bet lands often, more than three in five, which is exactly what makes it feel safe, but placing at cut odds never covers the times the favourite runs nowhere or, over jumps, falls and loses you the lot. The frequent small returns hide a steady leak, not a profit.
Back the favouriteThe shortest price each race−8.8p−£18−£76−£914▾
Pascal is half right and that is the trap. The favourite does win most often, roughly a third of all races, but "wins most often" is not the same as "makes money". The bookmaker bakes a margin into every price, so even a fairly judged favourite pays back less than it should on average, and plenty still get beaten or, over jumps, fall and pull up so you lose those stakes too. Back the favourite in every race and you pay that margin every single time, which is why this loses 8.79% to starting price across 27,676 bets: stake £100 and you are left with about £91.21 over the long run. It is among the least painful of the basic bets, but it is still a steady leak, and measured to SP with no commission, so in the real world it bleeds a little faster.
Back the second favouriteOne off the favourite−12.0p−£24−£104−£1,244▾
It loses, and harder than backing the favourite: backing the second favourite in every race returned -11.96% to starting price across 27,674 real bets, so for every £100 staked you got about £88.04 back over the long run, a steeper leak than the favourite's -8.79%. The reason is simple. The second favourite isn't mispriced, it's just the next-shortest horse in the field, and the bookmaker bakes the same margin, the overround, into its price as into every other runner. You're not finding value, you're paying the house edge on a horse that wins barely more than one race in five, far less often than the favourite, so the extra few points of odds never come close to covering the run of losers. Picking a "sensible" runner doesn't remove the tax built into the odds, it just hides it.
Top-rated horseHighest official rating−15.8p−£32−£137−£1,641▾
It loses heavily. Backing the highest officially-rated runner in every race returned -15.78% to starting price across 24,455 bets, so for every £100 you staked you got back about £84.22. The trouble is that the rating tells you who the handicapper thinks is best, and the whole betting public can read that same number off the racecard, so the horse is already short in the market and its price has swallowed all that quality. You are paying full whack for information that is free to everyone, and the bookmaker's built-in margin, the overround, takes its cut on top whether you back the best horse or the worst. On top of that the top-rated runner wins only about 19 in 100 of these races, nowhere near often enough to cover a long run of beaten favourites. Knowing who is good is not the same as getting paid for it.
Lucky 15 on favourites15 bets off four favourites−17.6p−£35−£153−£1,825▾
You are not covered, you are paying the bookmaker's margin fifteen times over. A Lucky 15 is fifteen bets in one (four singles, six doubles, four trebles and a four-fold), and every leg is a favourite, which on its own loses about 8.8p in the pound once you count the fallers and pulled-up horses as the losing bets they are. The singles already leak that margin, and the multiples are worse, because tying favourites together multiplies the house edge instead of adding it, and one beaten favourite kills every multiple it sits in. Stack all that up and the Lucky 15 on four favourites returns -17.55% to Starting Price, so for every £100 staked you get back about £82.45. One winner returning your stake feels like a save, but that is the bet quietly handing the bookie roughly £18 in every £100 over time. Backing favourites does not beat the margin, and folding them into fifteen bets just lets you pay it fifteen times.
A random horsePin in the racecard−21.5p−£43−£187−£2,239▾
It does not give you the same shot, and the numbers say so plainly: a random runner returned -21.53% to starting price across 27,676 bets, so for every £100 staked you got back only about £78.47. That is about two and a half times as bad as backing the favourite, which loses about 8.79%, because a random pick wins just 13 times in every 100 races. The reason is two things working against you. First, every price on the card carries the bookies' built-in margin, the overround, so the odds always add up to more than 100% and the average runner is priced to lose. Second, a blind pick lands on a longshot far more often than the favourite, and longshots are the worst value of all (the favourite-longshot bias), so you pay the house edge and the bad-value tax at once. No homework means no edge, just a faster leak.
Four-fold on favouritesFour favourites in an acca−30.8p−£62−£268−£3,202▾
It loses, and heavily: four favourites in an accumulator comes out at -30.79% to Starting Price, so for every £100 staked you get back only about £69.21. Here is why. A favourite is no near-certainty, it wins barely a third of the time, and even backed on its own to SP it already loses 8.8p in the pound because the bookmaker's margin is baked into the price. When you multiply four of those prices together you multiply that margin four times over too, so the four-fold carries a far bigger built-in edge against you than any single leg. All four favourites must win or the whole slip is dead, and the run of days where just one gets turned over swamps the rare day they all land, which is exactly why the loss is this deep.
Back the outsiderThe big price, every time−34.7p−£69−£302−£3,609▾
This is the worst single bet on the whole page. Backing the longest price in every race returned -34.70% to starting price across 27,676 bets, so for every £100 staked you got back about £65.30. The outsider is long for a reason: it wins just 3% of the time, far less often than even its big price suggests. Bookies pad those huge prices with extra margin, the favourite-longshot bias, so the rare winner never comes close to paying for the long, long run of losers in between, and over jumps a lot of these no-hopers fall or pull up and you lose those stakes too. The dream is real, the maths is brutal, and the maths wins.
Four-fold on random horsesFour random horses in an acca−62.1p−£124−£539−£6,456▾
It loses, and it is the worst slip on this whole page: over the sample it returned about -62.08% to SP, so for every £100 staked you got back roughly £37.92. Here is why. A single random horse already loses about 21.5p in the pound, because every price carries the bookie's margin and a blind pick has no judgement to offset it. Stack four of those legs together and you do not add that leak, you multiply it, four bets at a bit over three-quarters back compounds down to about £37.92 back, and all four horses must win or the whole thing dies. The rare big winner is real, but it is far rarer than the multiplied price makes it feel, which is exactly why the random four-fold is the bookmaker's favourite slip and the fastest way on this page to empty your pocket.
What it costs you a week
The same £200 a week on each system, so the bars compare like for like. Every bar is below the line: this is the weekly cost of the habit, from a graze to a bloodbath.
And where that leaves you over time
A real punter staking £200 a week, balance running week by week. These are the single bets, the kind you can actually watch unfold. The lines wobble (a longshot lands, a favourite obliges) but they all drift the same way: down. Tap a name to show or hide its line.
The scientific bit
Each system's return is measured on 27,676 real British races to starting price. The horses that fell or pulled up are counted as the losing bets they are, not quietly dropped, and joint-favourite ties are split so no result can leak in. We caught both of those bugs in earlier versions of this very table, and fixing them is why not one of the 24 systems here finishes in front, not even the jumps favourite. We stake the same £200 a week on every one, so what you see is the system, not the stake. Everything is to SP with no commission, which if anything flatters every line, and the accumulators are a lottery: the figure shown is the long-run average, but in reality you lose the whole stake on the vast majority of days and the rare big win never recovers the rest.
Betting systems: the questions everyone asks
Straight answers, from the data, to the things people (and search engines) ask about these systems. Tap a question.
The basics
Do betting systems actually work?
Can you beat the bookies long term?
What does it really mean that no system beats the bookmaker?
The bookmaker edge
What is the over-round (the bookmaker's margin)?
How much does field size change the bookmaker's margin?
What is the favourite-longshot bias?
Why do longshots lose more than favourites?
Why does backing the favourite still lose if favourites win most often?
Specific bets
Is backing the favourite profitable?
Is the second favourite a good bet?
Is each-way betting better value?
Are accumulators (accas) worth it?
Is the jumps favourite the one system that has made money?
Systems and tipsters
Do staking plans like the Martingale help?
Is following a tipster or model profitable?
Did your AI model find a way to win?
The bottom line
What is the safest way to bet?
So what should I take away from all this?
How to lose less
The leak above is not bad luck — it is the bookmaker's margin doing exactly what it is built to do. You cannot switch it off, but you can decide how fast you pay it.
Understand the margin you are paying
Every race's prices add up to more than 100% — that overround is the house edge, baked in before you pick a horse. Knowing how to read it is the single most useful skill on this site: what a price really means.
Fewer bets beat clever bets
The margin is charged per bet, so turnover is the enemy. The table above shows it plainly: the steepest leaks belong to the multiples, because every leg of an accumulator pays the margin again. One considered bet costs less than four hopeful ones.
The least-leaky habits still leak
The best-behaved system on the board still returns -5p per £1 staked — a smaller loss, not a profit. Chasing the “winning system” is how the leak gets worse; the full comparison explains why.
Set the budget before the bet
The £200-a-week punter above never varies the stake, and that discipline is the one part worth copying: decide what a week's racing is allowed to cost, treat it as the price of the entertainment, and never chase it. If betting stops feeling like entertainment, free and confidential help is at BeGambleAware.org. 18+.
Figures update as new races settle. This page is research, not tips — the numbers describe what each habit has done over a large honest sample, and none of it is a signal to stake.
