StableBet
Professor Furlong and Pascal at the AI Lab
THE AI LAB
PASCAL'S PANEL · WEEK 15

Pascal's Panel - Week 15: Double on two favourites vs Each-way an outsider

This week on the Panel

Welcome to the Panel, where every betting idea gets a proper test. Two strategies in front of the Professor this week, both run over real races with the method laid bare, so you can see for yourself how each one holds up.

First, Pascal, the eternal optimist. He His single favourite just missed, so he is chasing a larger return this time., so this week he is doubling up on two short-priced runners: Double on two favourites, Two favourites in a win double. He is certain he has cracked it. He usually is, and that is exactly why his ideas are worth testing.

Second, a new idea. It comes from Eddie, one of our AI punter personas: the each-way optimist, the sort who would back anything covered both ways for a safety net. The persona is modelled, not a real reader (more on that just below), but the strategy it suggests is a genuine, testable one: Each-way an outsider, The guest persona proposes to back an outsider in an each-way fashion..

The Professor tested both the only way that counts: against 26,839 real British races, flat stakes to Starting Price, with the fallers and pulled-up horses counted honestly as losses. Here is how each one actually performs.

Pascal
Pascal
the eternal optimist
−17.4p / £1
This week's pick Double on two favourites

“Both are favourites, so both should win, and stacking the two prices turns a couple of short returns into one tidy payout. If they're good enough to be jollies on their own, what's the harm in tying them together?”

Meet Pascal

Pascal is the Lab's resident optimist and Professor Furlong's foil, certain every single week that he has finally cracked it. He turns up with a fresh angle, usually an accumulator or a way to chase last week's loss back, pitches it with total confidence, and watches the Professor test it properly on real races. He never wins and never learns, and he is the warmest reason to keep coming back.

See the full experiment →
Eddie
the each-way optimist
−30.3p / £1
This week's pick Each-way an outsider

“Back a 12/1 shot each-way and you cannot really lose. If it wins you collect a fortune, and even if it only plods into third the place money pays you back and then some. It is the canny way to chase a big price, isn't it?”

Meet Eddie

Eddie backs everything each-way so a placed horse still gives something back, which feels like a safety net. But the place part pays only a slice of already-shortened odds, and the margin sits in both halves, so landing often quietly hides a steady leak.

Their tell: anything covered both ways for a safety net

See the full experiment →

Professor Furlong's verdict

Professor Furlong
On Pascal's pick It loses heavily, and the reason is the maths, not bad luck. Backing one favourite already loses about 9.1p in every pound, because the bookmaker's margin is baked into the price. Tie two together and you do not cancel that out, you stack it: each leg drags its own losing edge, the favourite only wins about a third of its races, and both have to land or the whole slip dies. Multiply two shaded prices and you multiply the house edge with them, which is why the double comes in at roughly -17.37% to Starting Price, nearly double the leak of a single favourite. So for every £100 staked you get back about £82.63. The second leg does not rescue the first, it just gives the bookie a second cut.
Professor Furlong
On Eddie's pick No. Each-waying 10/1-plus outsiders returned -30.28% over 28,276 bets, so for every £100 staked you got back about £69.72. It is one of the worst bets on this whole page, and here is why. You are paying twice, a win stake and a place stake, on a horse the market has already priced as very unlikely, and these win just 7% of the time. On a big-priced runner the place part pays only a fraction of the odds, often a fifth, so even when it does sneak into the frame the place return rarely covers the failed win half, and most days it does neither and you lose the lot. Bookmakers also overprice longshots on purpose, the favourite-longshot bias, which is exactly why this bleeds far harder than backing shorter prices. A handful will land at huge odds and feel like proof it works, but that is just variance flattering a few results, not a system that pays.

The standings

Both of this week's strategies sit on the leaderboard already. Here is where everything we have tested stands right now, ranked by real-world return, the least-negative at the top. Every system is a net loss, so the top row is the best real performer, not a winner.

24 systems tested · 30,082real races · none beat the bookmaker's margin. The best real return is −0.8pin the pound, so even the strongest system is a net loss. The bookmaker's margin is the reason.

#StrategyWho proposed itReal return (per £1)£/weekSampleStrike£200/week → today
1The AI's most-confident picksThe ProfessorGuest: RishiAI persona, modelled−0.8p−£2361——
2Odds-on favourites onlyThe systemsGuest: BarryAI persona, modelled−5.4p−£115,049wins 60%−£1,039
3Favourite in a big fieldThe systemsTested system−7.5p−£15673wins 24%—
4Favourite in a small fieldThe systemsGuest: CarolAI persona, modelled−7.7p−£154,256wins 46%—
5Favourite over jumpsThe systemsTested system−8.1p−£1610,549wins 37%−£2,220
6Festival favouritesThe systemsGuest: CarolAI persona, modelled−8.3p−£172,351wins 32%—
7Each-way the favouriteThe basicsGuest: EddieAI persona, modelled−8.8p−£1830,082places 62%—
8Back the favouriteThe basicsTested system−9.1p−£1830,082wins 35%−£1,915
9Favourite on soft groundThe systemsGuest: CarolAI persona, modelled−9.1p−£1811,151wins 35%—
10Favourite in handicapsThe systemsTested system−9.3p−£1920,132wins 30%—
11Favourite on the FlatThe systemsTested system−9.6p−£1919,533wins 34%—
12Follow the AIThe ProfessorGuest: RishiAI persona, modelled−11.4p−£236,601——
13Back the second favouriteThe basicsGuest: SandraAI persona, modelled−12.1p−£2430,080wins 21%−£3,223
14Top-rated horseThe basicsGuest: FrankAI persona, modelled−15.4p−£3126,684wins 19%−£3,703
15Top-rated in handicapsThe systemsGuest: FrankAI persona, modelled−15.9p−£3220,113wins 16%—
16Double on two favouritesThe multiplesPascal, the punter−17.4p−£35———
17Lucky 15 on favouritesThe multiplesPascal, the punter−18.1p−£36———
18A random horseThe basicsGuest: DawnAI persona, modelled−21.4p−£4330,082wins 13%−£5,918
19Back the lowest drawThe systemsGuest: StanAI persona, modelled−25.2p−£5019,509wins 12%—
20Back the old stagersThe systemsGuest: CarolAI persona, modelled−27.0p−£548,903wins 9%—
21Each-way an outsiderThe basicsGuest: EddieAI persona, modelled−30.3p−£6128,276wins 7%—
22Four-fold on favouritesThe multiplesPascal, the punter−31.7p−£63———
23Back the outsiderThe basicsGuest: LornaAI persona, modelled−35.3p−£7130,082wins 3%−£6,084
24Four-fold on random horsesThe multiplesPascal, the punter−61.9p−£124———

24 systems tested · 26,839 real races · none beat the bookmaker's margin. The best real return is -4p in the pound. The bookmaker's margin, the over-round, the slice baked into every price so the odds add up to more than 100%, sits in all of them, and no selection rule we have tested clears it. That is the genuinely useful part: the leaderboard shows exactly where the edge goes.

See the full Betting Systems Leaderboard →

What we're testing next week

Pascal will be Pascal will surely be looking for a single bold stroke to recover his fortunes.. And another of the personas has floated Next week's guest considers a more cautious approach., and we will run it the same way, against real races, with the method shown and the real result reported.

If you take one thing from the Panel, take this: picking a likely winner is the easy part. Getting paid more than the true risk is the hard part, and the over-round is what stands in the way. That is the insight every row on the leaderboard is really measuring. Bet for fun, with money you can afford to lose, and read our track record for whether anyone, us included, holds a real edge at all.

More Pascal's Panel issues